Attorney writes about the Government Center while city resident calls over infrastructure complaint
Posted by Editorial Staff on 12th November 2019
| 330 views

The Baltimore Post received the following letter from Attorney Ronald Schaeffer regarding the North Point Government Center.

The letter is published as written.

In addition to Mr. Schaeffer’s letter, the Post received an early morning call from an angry citizen of Baltimore City about the road conditions in the area of North Avenue and Fulton Ave.


In the article, “Olszewski encourage talks” (10-14-19), Baltimore County Executive Olszewski contends it would take tens of millions of dollars to renovate or repair the existing facilities at North Point Government Center Park in Dundalk. This bald assertion begs several questions. Has the County ever commissioned an impartial expert to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the existing facility, as has been requested by the community? North Point’s historic brick building is one of the oldest public structures in the area. It was constructed to serve the needs of a booming school population during the post-WWII years when Bethlehem’s steel was king. After the school doors closed for good, the Dundalk Chorus of the Chesapeake scrapped, scrubbed, and washed down the performance hall so recreation programs could have a home. Volunteer program leaders made over other parts of the building, so kids had a place to play. Has any consideration been given to conducting a robust community meeting to determine what else the residents would like to see at this site? The arts, local history, and environmental possibilities are unlimited.

What money is currently budgeted for North Point? What (if any) effort has been made to engage our state government in assisting with such a worthwhile project? What effort has been made to research grant potential? Has consideration been given to completing a state-of-the-art community facility in phases – as has been the case with many capital projects? The County Executive often refers to his intent to make Baltimore County better. We would argue why not the best for our community? As RFK once stated, “Some men see things as they are, and ask why. I dream of things that never were and ask why not.” Why not the BEST for Dundalk, Mr. Olszewski?

The County Executive mentioned a significant risk of litigation if it backed out of the proposed contract. It is important to note that local citizens advised the County of the requirement of PRIOR Board of Public Works approval for the proposed contract, and requested them to delay voting until approval was granted. An arrogant County Council (which did not yet include Councilman Crandell) railroaded the vote through in December 2013, without consulting the Board. To add insult to injury, in November 2014, the same arrogant and lame-duck County Council (over the objections of incoming Councilman Crandell) amended the original contract and railroaded it through without BPW approval. Litigation is always possible and sometimes necessary.

By ignoring the legal requirement and putting the cart before the horse, the County and the proposed developer decided to roll the dice and take the Board of Public Works for granted. Does the saying “Live by the sword. Die by the sword” come to mind?

While there are no guarantees as to who would win any legal dispute, most citizens would respect and appreciate any elected official who “fights the good fight”. Few things are more important than preserving our environment and open space for future generations. Wouldn’t that be a great legacy for any elected official? Some things are priceless!

Ronald R. Schaeffer
Dundalk, MD

Please disable your AdBlocker so our free service can continue delivering you breaking news, insightful analysis, and a collection of aggregated content that will keep you informed like no other.