Day: April 9, 2024

Of all the economic and other news items in the last day or two, I don’t want anyone to miss the important words of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. 

Mr. Austin said at a Senate Armed Services hearing that there was no evidence Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians during the Hamas war in Gaza. Now, the question was asked by Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Mr. Austin said: “We don’t have any evidence of genocide being committed.” 

According to reports, Cotton repeated the question. Secretary Austin replied, “We don’t have evidence of that to my knowledge,” and, further, Cotton mentioned that Austin has been accused of “greenlighting genocide,” and Mr. Austin responded by saying this: 

AUSTIN: What I would say, Sen. Cotton, from the very beginning, is we committed to help assist Israel in defending its territory and its people by providing security assistance, and I would remind everybody that what happened on Oct. 7 was absolutely horrible and, you know, numbers of Israeli citizens killed, and then a couple of hundred Israeli citizens taken hostage… American citizens as well.

COTTON: So, you deny the accusation that you greenlit genocide?

AUSTIN: I absolutely deny it.

HOW IT STARTED … HOW IT’S GOING: INFLATION-ADJUSTED HOURLY WAGES LOWER TODAY THAN WHEN BIDEN TOOK OFFICE 

Well, I’ll tell you, against the backdrop of recent actions and statements by President Biden and his various minions suggesting the administration is betraying Israel, and walking away from Israel’s commitment to destroying Hamas, and all the various attacks on Israel about civilian casualties and deaths and famine, most of which are not true, and when they are true, Israel has apologized, but Hamas uses Palestinian human shields, and they — Hamas — are the ones committing war crimes, not Israel. 

So, Defense Secretary Austin’s statement in front of the Senate today was a very welcome development, in my judgment, and Sen. Cotton also mentioned that Austin’s statement was a lot better than CIA Director William Burns’ and National Intelligence Director Avril Haines’, both of whom dodged the question at an intelligence committee hearing last month. 

Now, of course, Israel is going after Hamas because they’re cutthroat terrorists and murderers, and, as Secretary Austin just said, what happened on Oct. 7 was absolutely horrible, but Israel has no intention of destroying Palestinian civilians, though unfortunately they are blamed for this by people on the far-left who don’t know what they’re talking about, and it’s not true. It has never been true.

Then I went and looked up the legal definition of “genocide,” and I found it. Section 1091 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code defines “genocide” as “violent attacks with specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.” 

Israel has not done this. Lloyd Austin is correct and Lloyd Austin’s defense of Israel is just what Joe Biden should be doing and should have been doing and saying all along. I’m now waiting for Joe Biden to publicly back up his defense secretary.

Then we’re all waiting for Mr. Biden to let Israel finish off the job by destroying Hamas, who are uncivilized barbarians and deserve to be destroyed. 

This article is adapted from Larry Kudlow’s opening commentary on the April 9, 2024, edition of “Kudlow.” 

Read More 

A federal appellate court on Tuesday upheld the decision by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to grant California a waiver allowing it to establish its own zero emission standards for tailpipes as well as electric vehicle requirements.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rejected a legal challenge to California’s standards that was brought by a group of 17 Republican-led states and entities that sell or produce liquid fuels.

In 2022, the Biden administration’s EPA restored California’s ability to establish its own zero-emission vehicle sales mandate and tailpipe emissions limits through 2025 — a move that reversed a 2019 decision by the Trump administration. 

Republicans opposed to the rule argued that the waiver for California gave it an unconstitutional regulatory power that was denied to other states. The court held that the EPA is required by the Clean Air Act to uphold California’s emissions standards as long as they’re at least as stringent as federal rules.

“In other words, the federal regulations continue to act as the floor for emissions regulations, but California can seek to enact its own more stringent regulatory program above those federal requirements,” the three judge panel wrote in their unanimous opinion.

CALIFORNIA APPROVES PLAN TO CUT FOSSIL FUEL DEMAND BY 86% BY 2045, GO ELECTRIC DESPITE BLACKOUT PROBLEMS

The court said the reversal of the EPA decision would address the states’ claims if automakers responded by selling fewer EVs or lowering prices of gas-powered models and wrote that there was no evidence to support that conclusion.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said the “court sided with common sense and public health against the fossil fuel industry and Republican-led states. This ruling reaffirms California’s longstanding right to address pollution from cars and trucks.”

The Ohio attorney general’s office, which argued on behalf of the Republican-led states, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION CONSIDERING EV SWITCH DELAY DUE TO WEAK DEMAND

California received a waiver from the EPA in 1993 for its first zero-emission vehicle standard. The EPA granted another Clean Air Act waiver for California in 2013 that was reinstated in 2022, when it also rejected a Trump-era decision to prohibit other states from adopting California’s tailpipe emissions standards.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) in August 2022 approved a plan to end the sale of gas-only vehicles in the state by 2035 and established yearly requirements for zero-emission vehicles beginning in 2026 that would escalate until the 2035 goal is met.

In May 2023, CARB asked the EPA for a new Clean Air Act waiver for new EV rules that would start in 2026. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents most major automakers, raised questions about EV’s requirements in February.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Last month, the EPA finalized the Biden administration’s new tailpipe emissions limits that would be in effect through 2032 and are weaker than its initial proposal from early 2023. The new rules require automakers to sell at least 50% plug-in and electric vehicles by 2030 to meet regulatory targets – down from 60% EVs by 2030 and 68% by 2032 under the initial proposal.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Read More